Home

You are here

News and Analysis

Destory public ed as we know it? "That's accurate."

h3. "Critics often say 'the governor is trying to destroy public education as we know it,' [Lansing attorney Richard] McLellan said. 'That's accurate.'"
Well, there it is. Doesn't get much more "straight from the horse's mouth" than coming from Lansing attorney and longtime political operative Richard McLellan. As a leader of the obscure Oxford Foundation, Mr. McLellan led the effort to devise a radically altered way of funding K-12 education for Gov. Snyder. He is also the author of the controversial Education Achievement Authority bill now in the legislature, as well as a proposal to dramatically increase the types of charter school that would receive public funding in Michigan. Some twelve years ago, he also spearheaded a constitutional amendment that would have permitted school vouchers in Michigan, which was defeated handily by the voters. This radical package of proposals is in danger of being overlooked in the wake of today's protests over a "right to work" bill and the use of pepper spray by police to subdue protesters visiting the Capitol to express their anger at that proposal. Click below to read more.

Death watch for our public schools?

*The Muskegon Heights "model," where education is turned over to charter schools and the local district remains as a shell to pay off the district's debt, looks to be spreading to Highland Park as well. Is this an omen? What can we do?*

Comparing the 2013 school aid budgets [Update: includes final conference report]

Budget bill main provisions: final conference report compared to Governor's proposal and House and Senate versions

End of the last illusions

h3. Past commitments to school aid fade away *Updated with final conference report* *None of the school aid budget proposals for next year offer significant help to our struggling local school districts.* Overall funding is essentially flat, though the dollars are allocated differently in the various proposals. "For a detailed breakdown of the final budget and the alternatives as passed by each chamber, please see this companion story.":http://www.miparentsforschools.org/node/167 Nevertheless, the budget bills do outline some major changes in how we fund our schools: * Use of the School Aid Fund to support community colleges and state universities is now a permanent feature (the final conference report includes intent language to change the name of the SAF to the "Comprehensive Education Fund"); * The commitment to maintaining the funding stream for K-12 education has been seriously eroded - for example, with the failure to replace earmarked revenue lost when the Michigan Business Tax was ended.
Special sections: 

By the numbers: the Snyder education budget

h3. When is an increase not really an increase? When it's an election year budget. Gov. Rick Snyder's budget proposal for the 2012-13 fiscal year was much anticipated, but its introduction was something of an anti-climax. In his budget presentation to the Legislature, the Governor described his proposals for K-12 education as a small but solid increase in funding. Other observers, looking closely at the numbers, begged to disagree. Regardless, the governor's budget proposal makes the recent, much-reduced funding levels permanent. What little room there is for increased funding will be occupied by incentive payments: financial carrots intended to encourage what the governor calls "best practices." Perhaps most important, it is clear that the Snyder Administration intends to lay to rest the idea that the School Aid Fund should be reserved for K-12 education. *UPDATE: This article describes the Governor's "executive recommendation" for the budget; versions passed out of both the House and Senate appropriations subcommittees will be analyzed in a forthcoming article.*
Special sections: 

Cyber school expansion bill heads to House floor

In a sometimes contentious session, the House Education committee today passed legislation that would remove most limits on the number and size of online charter schools -- called "cyber schools" in Michigan. The bill, Senate Bill 619, removes the restrictions set on the number and enrollment of cyber schools when they were first allowed in legislation passed two years ago. The bill, passed by the Senate last fall, faces an uncertain future in the House.

A surplus for schools? Don't hold your breath

The latest projections show that revenue to the state School Aid Fund, which supports K-12 education in Michigan, will increase 2.7% next year, compared to a 4.3% drop this year. But will local public schools get a funding increase? There will be a lot of politics at work between now and the start of school next fall, and little can be taken for granted. While Governor Snyder is likely to use any school aid surplus to make one-time "pay for performance" payments, there is significantly less money available to do that this year.

Legislative alert: "charter school package" could dramatically undermine our schools



Dear supporters of public education,

Much-anticipated legislation was introduced today that would dramatically reshape the public school landscape in Michigan. We cannot afford to wait and see how the legislative process works itself out - we must start making our voices heard now. Use the Michigan Parents for Schools advocacy system to contact your Senator!

The four-bill package, driven by co-sponsor Sen. Phil Pavlov (R-St. Claire), was just made available to the public today - coinciding with the start of hearings on these bills in the Senate Education committee.

The bills can only be described as an assault on traditional public schools in this state.

Historical Amnesia: Schools don't need that money, do they?

*Talk of an ever-growing flow of money to schools is, like many such things, wildly exaggerated. But it does serve to frame the debate about school funding in such a way that cutting schools seems only "fair."* We started to hear it during the debate over next year's state budget. Lawmakers backing the governor's budget responded to constituents worried about cuts to K-12 schools with two, oddly contradictory, palliatives: that money for schools continued to "pour in" even though there were fewer students; and that "getting spending in line with reality means understanding our lack of revenue." Sometimes these earnest-sounding claims were in the same paragraph. The most recent example of this effort to depict schools as awash in cash comes in an "interview of State Budget Director John Nixon":http://content.usatoday.net/dist/custom/gci/InsidePage.aspx?cId=battlecr... by the AP's Kathy Barks Hoffman.

Close look: Teacher evaluation provisions

*Among the least discussed, and arguably most important, aspects of the "tenure bills" which recently became law are the provisions mandating new teacher evaluation systems and creating a process to identify a model which most districts in Michigan will have to use.* This article provides an in-depth look at the teacher and administrator evaluation provisions in the law, highlighting some of the choices legislators made which reflect their views of teachers and educators in general. Attached to the article is a table comparing provisions in the final legislation with a separate bill on evaluation systems from which it derived. MIPFS believes that it's critically important for parent activists and others to be aware of these changes and the impact they are likely to have on our schools.
Departments: 

Pages

Drupal theme by pixeljets.com D7 ver.1.1